Bits and pieces of fun/interesting facts about PSYchology

I am an PSYchology adjunct instructor and created this blog for my students and other teachers to have fun with the diverse scope of this topic.

Saturday, July 29, 2017

OCCUPATIONAL INTERESTS BASED ON HOLLAND’S THEORY OF CAREER CHOICE AND PERSONALITY

Occupational interests based on Holland’s theory of 
career choice and personality

Worker Characteristics are enduring characteristics that may influence both performance and the capacity to acquire knowledge and skills required for effective work performance (National Center for O*Net Development, 2017). Two of these characteristics are interests and values, which reflect preferences for work environments and outcomes and are called “Occupational Interests.” 

Occupational interests have been classified by different researchers. One of the researchers, Dr. John Holland, developed a model of personality types and work environments in 1985. (image of Holland’s Hexagon from https://www.careerkey.org/choose-a-career/hollands-theory-of-career-choice.html#.WXwqQ4QrJ0w)



Dr. Holland (1973) indicated that "the choice of a vocation is an expression of personality" and his vocational personality type theory model is used in the Occupational Information Network (O*NET) developed under the sponsorship of the US Department of Labor/Employment and Training Administration (USDOL/ETA). Holland’s model, the R-I-A-S-E-C Inventory, categorized the various occupational/personality interests into 6 types:  R = realistic, I = investigative, A = artistic, S = social, E = enterprising, C = conventional. (image from: https://www.careerkey.org/choose-a-career/hollands-theory-of-career-choice.html#.WXwqQ4QrJ0w)


Individuals usually have one interest that is the strongest/highest, but may also have a combination of two interests. Here is a brief description of each of the six interest codes (HollandCodes.com, 2017):

1.     Realistic is one of the Holland Codes. Realistic types prefer to deal with Things.  A person with a Realistic Personality tends to be frank, practical, focused, mechanical, determined, or rugged. Examples of Realistic Abilities include manipulating tools, doing mechanical or manual tasks, or doing athletic activities.

2.     Investigative is one of the Holland Codes. Investigative types prefer to deal with Things and Ideas. A person with an Investigative Personality tends to be analytical, intellectual, reserved, independent, and scholarly. Examples of Investigative Abilities include working with abstract ideas and intellectual problems.

3.     Artistic is one of the Holland Code Career Types. Artistic types prefer to deal with Ideas and People. A person with an Artistic Personality tends to be Complicated, Original, Impulsive, Independent, Expressive, and Creative. Examples of Artistic Abilities include using imagination and feelings in creative expression.

4.     Social is one of the Holland Occupational Codes. Social types prefer to deal with People. A person with a Social Personality tends to be Helping, Informing, Teaching, Inspiring, Counseling, and Serving. Examples of Social Abilities include interacting with people and concerned with the welfare of people.

5.     Enterprising is one of the Holland Occupational Codes. Enterprising types prefer to deal with Data and People. A person with an Enterprising Personality tends to be Characteristics: Persuasive, Energetic, Sociable, Adventurous, Ambitious, and Risk-taking. Examples of Enterprising Abilities include leading, managing, and organizing.

6.     Conventional is one of the Holland Occupational Codes. Conventional types prefer to deal with Data and Things. A person with a Conventional Personality tends to be Careful, Conforming, Conservative, Conscientious, Self-controlled, and Structured. Examples of Conventional Abilities include ordering activities paying attention to details.

You can see more information about each career code and matching jobs at O*Net “Interests," O*NET OnLine, National Center for O*NET Development (https://www.onetonline.org/find/descriptor/browse/Interests/)


References

Holland, J. (1973) Making Vocational Choices: a theory of careers. Prentice-Hall, 6.

HollandCodes.com. Holland Code Career Models. Retrieved July 29, 2017, from http://www.hollandcodes.com/holland_code_career.html

National Center for O*NET Development. About O*NET. O*NET Resource Center. Retrieved July 29, 2017, from https://www.onetcenter.org/aboutOnet.html

Prepared by Mary Noble, PhD on 7/28/17 http://psychologyfun.blogspot.com/


www.doggandponyshow.blogspot.com

Thursday, April 7, 2016

Why do computer science/technology students have to take a psychology class? How do psychology and computer technology connect?


This is a question that many of my Introduction to Psychology students ask, so I have prepared this handout to answer it.

The best answers to this question can be found in Dr. Larry Rosen’s research, who is the Professor and past chair of the psychology department at California State University, Dominguez Hills. He is a research psychologist with specialties in multitasking, social networking, generational differences, parenting, child and adolescent development, and educational psychology, and is recognized as an international expert in the “Psychology of Technology.”  His book, Rewired: The Psychology of Technology, discusses how technology influences family life, education, the workplace, and every waking moment of our lives.  Larry Rosen, Ph.D., 1991; see:  https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/rewired-the-psychology-technology .  Dr. Rosen writes:  I study the impact of technology and media on children, teens and adults in all arenas including the home, school, the workplace and leisure time activities. My newest book, iDisorder: Understanding Our Obsession With Technology and Overcoming its Hold on Us, discusses how technology is making us all exhibit signs and symptoms of psychiatric disorders such as OCD, narcissism, voyeurism, and depression. It is full of strategies for resetting your brain and avoiding aniDisorder. My next book is called "The Distracted Mind" and is due out in early 2016. http://drlarryrosen.com/  

More about Dr. Rosen’s book, iDisorder: Understanding Our Obsession with Technology and Overcoming Its Hold on Us, March 27, 2012 by Larry D. Rosen (http://drlarryrosen.com)  iDisorder: are changes to your brain's ability to process information and your ability to relate to the world due to your daily use of media and technology resulting in signs and symptoms of psychological disorders - such as stress, sleeplessness, and a compulsive need to check in with all of your technology. Based on decades of research and expertise in the "psychology of technology," Dr. Larry Rosen offers clear, down-to-earth explanations for why many of us are suffering from an "iDisorder." Rosen offers solid, proven strategies to help us overcome the iDisorder we all feel in our lives while still making use of all that technology offers. Our world is not going to change, and technology will continue to penetrate society even deeper leaving us little chance to react to the seemingly daily additions to our lives. Rosen teaches us how to stay human in an increasingly technological world.

Below is a student paper on psychology and technology – although it has many multiple errors and does not provide a list of references, its substance highlights how psychology and technology are “connected.”

PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECT OF TECHNOLOGY (TECHNOPHOBIA)
Retrieved April 7, 2016, from http://www.csun.edu/~emh8437/paper2.html  (Eun Mee Hahn. This is his webpage for ENGLISH 305 class at California State University; emh8437@csun.edu, May 2, 2002)

Technology is taking over all aspects of life. Education, work and leisure are all becoming increasingly dependent on being able to interact with technology. But what of the academic or career prospects of those who do not want to interact with this technology? Before taking this English 305 class, I tried to avoid computers as much as possible. I didnt have any interest in cyberspace such as chatting, email, and gender swapping. Through this class, I had a chance to contact others through cyberspace. However, I still have a fear of computers. I decided that I want to know more about computers and cyberspace. I will first discuss cyberspace, then I will discuss about technophobia.

Its well known that people say and do things in cyberspace that they wouldnt ordinarily say or do in the face-to-face world. The virtual world is quite different from the real world. People cant see a person in cyberspace. People cant see a persons facial expressions and body language. The sensory experience of encountering others in cyberspace-seeing, hearing, and combining seeing and hearing is limited. For the most part, people communicate through typed language. In cyberspace, people will probably never be able to physically interact with each other. There are no handshakes, pats on the back, hugs, or kisses.

The limited sensory experiences of cyberspace have some significant disadvantages- as well as some unique advantages - as compared to in-person encounters. Since communicating only with typed text, people have the option of being themselves, expressing only parts of their identity, assuming imaginative identities, or remaining completely anonymous. Anonymity has a disinhibiting effect that cuts two ways. Sometimes people use it to act out some unpleasant need or emotion, often by abusing other people. Anonymity also allows them to be honest and open about some personal issue that they could not discuss in a face-to-face encounter.

Sitting quiet and staring at the computer monitor can bring a person to an altered state of consciousness. Some people experience a blending of their mind with that of the other person. Some people experience a state of consciousness that resembles dreams. These altered and dream-like states of consciousness in cyberspace may account for why the Internet is so attractive for some people. It might also help explain some forms of computer and cyberspace addiction. In cyberspace, birds of a feather easily can flock together. Support groups devoted to helping people with their problems can be a very beneficial feature of cyberspace. For people with antisocial motivations, thats a very negative feature of cyberspace.

In most cases, everyone in cyberspace has an equal opportunity to voice his or her opinion. Everyone, regardless of status, wealth, race, gender, etc. starts off on a level playing field. Some people call this the net democracy. Although ones status in the outside world ultimately will have some impact on ones life in cyberspace, there is some truth to this net democracy ideal.

Now, I want to write about technophobia, which is a resistance to talking about computers or even thinking about computers. Although technology is taking over all aspects of life, there are up to half of the population is technophobic, possessing negative opinions about, or having anxiety towards, information technology such as personal computers. I found a study the book, Technophobia (Mark J. Brosnan). Thirty-seven per cent of the general public report regularly using a personal computer, a far higher percentage than mobile phones, electronic organizers, pagers, modems, etc. (MORI, 1996).

When the factors of anxiety and attitude, or, more specially, of computer anxiety and computer attitude, are combined, the concept of computer phobia indeed begins to emerge. Since I was a technophobic person, I want to know how this psychologically impact peoples life. There was an original assumption that technophobia would be a transitory phenomenon, common amongst older adults who had missed out upon technology in their education.

Raubs (1981) early study reported that older people were more anxious than younger people. Other research indicates that the over fifties are less anxious than the under thirties, suggesting that far from reducing anxiety, computer experience can increase anxiety levels (Brosnan pg. 11). However, Anderson (1981), Elder et al. (1987) and Igbaria and Parasuraman (1989) have all found that age has a positive effect upon computer anxiety. As the diffusion of technology throughout many aspects of life has exposed virtually everyone to computerization, the relationship between anxiety, age and experience has become less clear. The only clear relationship between age and computer anxiety would therefore appear to be with respect to ones age when first interacting with a computer.

I found a very interesting study, which shows the difference of psychological impact between male and female. Just as technophobia has been reported as affecting more females than males, computer addiction has been found to be almost exclusively a male phenomenon (Shotton, 1989). Brosnan (1995) identified that in a student population, male students first interaction with computers occurred significantly earlier than female students first interaction with computers. This is significant as Todman and Monaghan (1994) report that early use of computers is associated with more favourable quality of initial experience, which leads to lower anxiety and greater readiness to use computers.

A large number of studies found that females report higher levels of computer anxiety than males (it is maybe not true because of my English teacher!). A smaller number of studies report no sex differences in computer anxiety. For example, Anderson (1981) found that males and females did not differ in their levels of anxiety, either before or after a computer literacy course. Temple and Lips (1989) found male students to have taken more computer science course and to be more likely to want to choose it as their major than female students. In conclusion, the findings regarding gender differences in technophobia have not been consistent.

Conclusion Whether we refer to the second industrial revolution or the digital revolution there can be little doubt that computer technology will play an ever-increasing role within our domestic, leisure and work environments. For the technophobe, this can only mean an increase in the potential sources of anxiety. Through this research, I could find a few things. First, by studying technophobia the full extent of the phenomenon has become apparent. With surveys revealing technophobia in up to 50 per cent of many populations, feelings of computer-related anxiety cannot be dismissed or marginalized. Indeed the sheer numbers of technophobes provide the commercial motivation for continued user-friendliness in hardware and software design. The huge preponderance of technophobia can in itself be empowering, such that an individual does not have to internalize feelings to personal inadequacies. Second, I found that much research has highlighted that feelings are transitory and that sex differences in computer-related attainment can be eradicated when recasting the computer-based task as appropriate for females. The literature on sex differences has been used to emphasize the role of these influences. Technophobia is a legitimate response to technology. Retrieved April 7, 2016, from http://www.csun.edu/~emh8437/paper2.html


Other resources where you can find more information about technophobia are:    

http://www.rightdiagnosis.com/t/technophobia/intro.htm for more details on technophobia

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/refire-don-t-retire/201603/geriatric-technophobia on geriatric technophobia


Prepared by Mary R. Noble, PhD
April 7, 2016

Saturday, August 8, 2015

Transformational language - people with disabilities

This is a useful handout that I had accessed on SAMHSA on the correct language to use when talking about people with disabilities and would share with my Introduction of Psychology classes.  However, it is no longer available on SAMHSA so I wanted to share it here:


SAMHSA’s Resource Center to Promote Acceptance, Dignity and Social Inclusion Associated with
Mental Health (ADS Center)
 http://www.promoteacceptance.samhsa.gov/publications/TransformationalLanguage.aspx
(no longer available on this website)

Guidance on Transformational Language
“Words have power. They have the power to teach, the power to wound, the power to shape the way people think, feel, and act toward others.”  —Otto Wahl

Transformation in services and supports for adults, and children and youth with behavioral health problems, requires a complementary transformation in the language we use to describe the people we serve. Quite literally, we should seek to employ “people first” language, prefacing our descriptions of the people we serve as people first, such as, people with mental health or substance use problems or challenges rather than mentally ill people or addicts. None of us should be defined by our problems or diagnoses, or by a single aspect of who we are; we are people first and foremost. 

The following list contains examples of transformational language.
Transformational Language
Outdated Language
Tom has a mental health or substance use problem or challenge.
Tom is mentally ill/emotionally disturbed/insane/crazy.
Dick has a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. He experiences mood swings.
Dick is (a) bipolar.
Jess experiences symptoms of psychosis. He hears voices.
Jess is (a) psychotic.
Susie is a person who receives help/
treatment for mental health or substance use problems. She is a recipient of behavioral health services.
Susie is a patient.
Harry is a person with co-occurring mental health and substance use problems.
Harry is mentally ill chemically abusing (MICA).
Jane is a person with a disability.
Jane is disabled/handicapped.
Bonnie is a child without disabilities.
Bonnie is normal/healthy.
Rebecca has a brain injury.
Rebecca is brain injured/damaged.
Ralph has asked for accessible parking/hotel room.
Ralph has asked for handicapped parking/hotel room.